<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the private cloud really a viable option for most enterprises?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://research.gigaom.com/2014/08/is-the-private-cloud-really-a-viable-option-for-most-enterprises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/08/is-the-private-cloud-really-a-viable-option-for-most-enterprises/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:27:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dfishman</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/08/is-the-private-cloud-really-a-viable-option-for-most-enterprises/#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dfishman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.gigaom.com/?p=235795#comment-1916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While &quot;SOA&quot; and &quot;*aaS&quot; have gathered dust as buzzwords, they provide more explanatory value than &#039;Hybrid&#039;. The transition to cloud is first and foremost a rethinking of where applications run, and what infrastructures enable nimble and reliable delivery of the suite of applications that companies need for competitive advantage. You&#039;re right to call &#039;bullshit&#039; on frankenstack implementations called &#039;private cloud&#039; inside traditional IT organizations that used the term to overcome years of balkanization (Target and Playstation are only 2 examples of the many such that ended in tears). But &#039;Hybrid&#039; runs the risk of masking similar bad behaviors, unless the organizations start by asking &quot;What aspects of cloud make my business go faster, and compete more effectively at a lower cost?&quot; The variable cost (CapEx to OpEx) model behind cloud economics need not be divided between AWS EC2 and IT cloudwashing; there are a range of compelling, cost-effective alternatives in between.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While &#8220;SOA&#8221; and &#8220;*aaS&#8221; have gathered dust as buzzwords, they provide more explanatory value than &#8216;Hybrid&#8217;. The transition to cloud is first and foremost a rethinking of where applications run, and what infrastructures enable nimble and reliable delivery of the suite of applications that companies need for competitive advantage. You&#8217;re right to call &#8216;bullshit&#8217; on frankenstack implementations called &#8216;private cloud&#8217; inside traditional IT organizations that used the term to overcome years of balkanization (Target and Playstation are only 2 examples of the many such that ended in tears). But &#8216;Hybrid&#8217; runs the risk of masking similar bad behaviors, unless the organizations start by asking &#8220;What aspects of cloud make my business go faster, and compete more effectively at a lower cost?&#8221; The variable cost (CapEx to OpEx) model behind cloud economics need not be divided between AWS EC2 and IT cloudwashing; there are a range of compelling, cost-effective alternatives in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>