<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Age of the Feed-Based User Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://research.gigaom.com/2010/09/opportunities-for-feed-based-user-interfaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2010/09/opportunities-for-feed-based-user-interfaces/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:27:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Card</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2010/09/opportunities-for-feed-based-user-interfaces/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Card]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=44588#comment-1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I put my Facebood &quot;friends&quot; in different groups for sorting, but I suspect most users hate to do much work. I like the idea of a mix of pre-determined and observed characteristics for filtering. Indeed, music genre stations tweaked with your favorites have long been a Pandora staple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put my Facebood &#8220;friends&#8221; in different groups for sorting, but I suspect most users hate to do much work. I like the idea of a mix of pre-determined and observed characteristics for filtering. Indeed, music genre stations tweaked with your favorites have long been a Pandora staple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste LeCompte</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2010/09/opportunities-for-feed-based-user-interfaces/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Celeste LeCompte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=44588#comment-1073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The major flaw with real-time feeds in my opinion is the ease with which you  can &quot;miss&quot; content. Take Facebook&#039;s &quot;top news&quot; vs. &quot;recent updates&quot; division. In one setting you&#039;re likely to miss items from your regular contacts that you&#039;d like to see, but in the other you miss out on the opportunity to discover old friends you&#039;d like to pay more attention to. 

I&#039;d love more axes along which to filter my &quot;feed&quot; content. I think user-facing analytics is one solution for users like me who are willing to work for it: Google Reader is actually a wonderful product in that regard. You can see which feeds you keep up with, what percentage of stories in different categories you&#039;re reading, which days you read the most, etc. Helpful for identifying gaps in what you&#039;re seeing and remindinding yourself of other feeds you&#039;ve neglected. 

But for services or moments or whatever where you want to be kind of lazy, perhaps you can also add value by creating &quot;seeded&quot; feeds — think Apple&#039;s Genius playlists instead of shuffle. The &quot;sort by magic&quot; feature on Google Reader is a good example, too. Some old, some new, some relevant, some surprises. Pandora does this too — it replays songs you already said you liked, but mixes in new stuff you haven&#039;t rated, and let&#039;s you exclude both songs and artists on a station-by-station basis. 

So, in summary, maybe my answer to the question is: more real-time feeds that give users an optimal mix of things they know they like, and things they don&#039;t know anything about yet. Music might be an interesting industry to draw on for ideas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major flaw with real-time feeds in my opinion is the ease with which you  can &#8220;miss&#8221; content. Take Facebook&#8217;s &#8220;top news&#8221; vs. &#8220;recent updates&#8221; division. In one setting you&#8217;re likely to miss items from your regular contacts that you&#8217;d like to see, but in the other you miss out on the opportunity to discover old friends you&#8217;d like to pay more attention to. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love more axes along which to filter my &#8220;feed&#8221; content. I think user-facing analytics is one solution for users like me who are willing to work for it: Google Reader is actually a wonderful product in that regard. You can see which feeds you keep up with, what percentage of stories in different categories you&#8217;re reading, which days you read the most, etc. Helpful for identifying gaps in what you&#8217;re seeing and remindinding yourself of other feeds you&#8217;ve neglected. </p>
<p>But for services or moments or whatever where you want to be kind of lazy, perhaps you can also add value by creating &#8220;seeded&#8221; feeds — think Apple&#8217;s Genius playlists instead of shuffle. The &#8220;sort by magic&#8221; feature on Google Reader is a good example, too. Some old, some new, some relevant, some surprises. Pandora does this too — it replays songs you already said you liked, but mixes in new stuff you haven&#8217;t rated, and let&#8217;s you exclude both songs and artists on a station-by-station basis. </p>
<p>So, in summary, maybe my answer to the question is: more real-time feeds that give users an optimal mix of things they know they like, and things they don&#8217;t know anything about yet. Music might be an interesting industry to draw on for ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
