<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The App Store Police Need More Muscle — Not Less</title>
	<atom:link href="http://research.gigaom.com/2010/07/why-the-app-store-police-need-more-muscle-not-less/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2010/07/why-the-app-store-police-need-more-muscle-not-less/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:27:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2010/07/why-the-app-store-police-need-more-muscle-not-less/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Gibbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=38678#comment-1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments, Paul. It will certainly be interesting to see how the App Store evolves -- I agree that more premium content will emerge (especially the enterprise stuff), but there will also be an increase in ad-supported apps (including plenty more crap). Apple has the benefit of being the sole distributor of iPhone apps, so it can do as it pleases. But I think there will be an opportunity for someone to step up and play the role of distributor of only top-notch Android apps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Paul. It will certainly be interesting to see how the App Store evolves &#8212; I agree that more premium content will emerge (especially the enterprise stuff), but there will also be an increase in ad-supported apps (including plenty more crap). Apple has the benefit of being the sole distributor of iPhone apps, so it can do as it pleases. But I think there will be an opportunity for someone to step up and play the role of distributor of only top-notch Android apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sweeting</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2010/07/why-the-app-store-police-need-more-muscle-not-less/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Sweeting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?p=38678#comment-1010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent piece, Colin. I wonder how Apple&#039;s filtering system will evolve (or not) as more premium content finds its way into the App Store and the average price of paid apps begins to increase. If there were real money at stake for developers, pressure on Apple (and Google for that matter) to crack down on copy-cats and knockoffs might increase. But that would only work if the infrastructure and culture for such policing are in place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent piece, Colin. I wonder how Apple&#8217;s filtering system will evolve (or not) as more premium content finds its way into the App Store and the average price of paid apps begins to increase. If there were real money at stake for developers, pressure on Apple (and Google for that matter) to crack down on copy-cats and knockoffs might increase. But that would only work if the infrastructure and culture for such policing are in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>