Is Lifelogging the Future of Social Media?

Anyone who has made fun of Facebook and Twitter and the comic level of hyper-connectedness they represent also has asked themselves: Where is all this mass digitization of our lives headed? The best answer yet may come in a new book out this month that represents the culmination of a 10-year experiment delving into the future of digital living: a Microsoft research project called MyLifeBits.

As part of that project, legendary computer scientist Gordon Bell has spent the last decade digitizing and archiving as much information from his daily life as possible, scanning documents, recording conversations, and snapping pictures every few minutes with a camera the size of a cigarette pack that hangs around his neck. He describes this experience, called “lifelogging,” and its larger implications in the book, “Total Recall: How the E-Memory Revolution Will Change Everything.”

As society steps further into what Om has called “an increasingly narcissistic phase, enabled by web technologies,” lifelogging seems simultaneously like the premise of a Philip K. Dick sci-fi novel and the logical extrapolation of current trends. We already share photos, videos, tweets and status updates in ways that would have seemed obsessive only a few years ago. We record our lives with web services like Evernote and devices like Livescribe.

If Facebook and Twitter are symptoms of narcissism, lifelogging could well be viewed as a sign of (or treatment for) a new kind of severe personality disorder. Which is not to say it won’t catch on. Although it could be confused as an extension of Twitter’s real-time reporting, lifelogging would be most useful as a searchable archive and memory aide (or substitute), as the title of Bell’s book suggests. But making it easy to use in that way will be its own challenge. If I want to recall the face of someone I met, how would I find it? Would I need to know the date or time of that meeting? Could I search for the image using key words in the attendant conversation, if the audio of it had been transcribed? That organizational technology may be starting to flower along with the rise of social media. HP, for example, has been developing software that intelligently organizes online photos into albums, having noticed how many people are averse to doing it themselves. In addition, the technologies needed to record all this information — speech recognition, digital documentation, mobile data, storage and cameras, for example – have advanced a great deal since Bell began his experiment. Others have been working on making lifelogging a reality, including Reqall, and some startups are reportedly developing a new generation of cameras suited to the task.

Obviously, the threat to privacy is one of the most troubling aspects of this proposition. And that threat is arguably biggest for those around lifeloggers. Police and civil litigants would presumably be able to search these life records whenever the need arose. I’m not sure where the line is drawn between the “e-memory revolution” and the gestalt surveillance state. I just know that I have already sworn off dancing at weddings and parties after having seen too many photos of myself in Vanilla Ice-like poses taken by friends with smartphones and shared among crowds of potentially thousands on Facebook. I’m likely to avoid lifeloggers for as long as I can. And its pioneers may succeed in collecting terabytes of images of folks scurrying in the opposite direction.

Question of the week

Would you want to lifelog?
Relevant analyst in web services
You must be logged in to post a comment.
2 Comments Subscribers to comment
  1. My answer is yes…because I already do it. It is called memory. Over the ages, we have only developed tools and technologies to help us do it better. From written journals to family photo albums to video to blogs and status updates, it has been an evolutionary process in which new tools gradually become ingrained in our lives. But this is not just about remembering…it is about sharing our experiences with others.

    How quickly my lifelogging extends to what Mr. Bell did depends on how passively it can be done. For me, it must require much less effort than it does today. Does the act of lifelogging change the event, because I am actively doing the logging? Would my interactions with family and friends have been different had I not been taking the time to update my status, log the event, take a photo and add an interesting caption? Did I miss something important that my young son said because I was distracted by the need to capture the moment? My good memories are good because I was fully immersed in the moment, not figuring out how I was going to remember it next week or in 10 years. I do believe we will get there and it will be really interesting to see the kinds of technologies that will emerge to help us.

  2. I’m pretty lax when It comes to keeping all of my social networking accounts up to date as it it, so I would say: no.

    But ^^^I imagine that soon it won’t be a case of deciding whether you want to be “lifelogging” or not, it will effectively happen automatically by default anyway, as the services that you use publish updates to each other.^^^

Explore Related Topics

Latest Research

Latest Webinars

Want to conduct your own Webinar?
Learn More

Learn about our services or Contact us: Email / 800-292-3024